SSC Judgement Synopsis

SSC JUDGMENT SYNOPSIS:

State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya & Ors.

Supreme Court Civil Appeal (ex-SLP 9586/2024) | Reported as 2025 INSC 437
Date of Judgment: 03 April 2025 | Coram: Sanjiv Khanna, CJI and Sanjay Kumar, J.

In a batch of connected appeals arising from the controversial 2016 WBSSC recruitment process for Groups C, D and Assistant Teachers (Classes IX–X and XI–XII), the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India upheld the Calcutta High Court’s judgment dated 22.04.2024, which had declared the entire selection process null and void.

The petitioners before the Supreme Court included numerous appointees—some found tainted, some claiming innocence, many with over 5 years of service—as well as the State of West Bengal and West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC). They contended that only illegal appointments should have been cancelled, not the entire recruitment.

However, after a detailed factual and legal analysis, the Hon’ble Court ruled that the recruitment process was irreparably tainted by systemic fraud, procedural lapses, and intentional cover-ups. The judgment establishes the following:

Factual Findings:

• Recruitment was governed under the WBSSC Rules, 2009 & 2016; ~24,640 posts were notified in 2016.
• Evaluation of OMR sheets was outsourced to M/s. Nysa Communications Pvt. Ltd., with no transparency in marks or panel formation.
• WBSSC destroyed OMR sheets, justifying it under Rule 21 (only for teachers), despite pending recruitment litigation.
• CBI investigation (based on HC orders) revealed large-scale manipulation of marks, unauthorized appointments, and tampering of selection data.
• The Justice R.K. Bag Committee reported serious irregularities in Group C & D appointments, including rank jumping, fake panels, and prima facie criminal liability of WBSSC officials.
• Hard disks recovered from ex-Nysa employee Pankaj Bansal and scanned data from Data Scantech proved discrepancies. Thousands of OMR-based scores were inflated.

Legal Principles Applied:

• Relying on Sachin Kumar v. DSSSB, Inderpreet Singh Kahlon, and other precedents, the Court reiterated that entire recruitment must be quashed if:
  • The fraud is widespread and affects the integrity of the process,
  • Segregation of innocent from guilty is impossible,
  • Public confidence in the selection is undermined.

Court’s Conclusions & Directions:

• Cancellation of entire 2016 recruitment process upheld.
• Tainted candidates must refund salaries with 12% interest.
• Non-tainted candidates are relieved from refund but lose their employment.
• Disabled candidate Soma Das allowed to continue on humanitarian grounds, but other such candidates can continue only until fresh recruitment.
• Previously employed non-tainted candidates may rejoin their old government positions, with seniority preserved (no salary for the disputed period).
• A fresh WBSSC recruitment is to be conducted after elections through a transparent, open tender process.
• The Court rejected delay, estoppel, and natural justice arguments, citing that fraud vitiates everything.
• A separate CBI probe into creation of supernumerary posts by the State is to continue, listed for further hearing on 08.04.2025.

The Court made it clear that systemic corruption and administrative complicity cannot be allowed to override the constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 16. Even where individual innocence exists, if the selection process is irretrievably compromised, no appointment can survive.

Original judgement PDF: SSC JUDGEMENT

#SSCcase
#SSCsupremeCourtCase
#SSCsupremeCourtJudgment
#WBSSCJudgment
#TeacherRecruitmentScam
#SupremeCourtIndia
#RecruitmentFraud
#CBIInvestigation
#OMRScam
#WestBengalJobsScam
#PublicEmploymentFraud
#EducationCorruption
#LandmarkJudgment
#JusticeForMerit
#TransparentRecruitment
#PatrasLawChambers
#Article14Rights
#Article16Equality
#FraudulentAppointments
#RuleOfLawPrevails

Prepared by:

Patras Law Chambers
Advocate Sudip Patra
Practicing in the Supreme Court of India & Calcutta High Court

Kolkata Office: NICCO HOUSE, 6th Floor, 2, Hare Street, Kolkata – 700001
Delhi Office: House No: 4455/5, 1st Floor, Gali Shahid Bhagat Singh, Main Bazar Road, Paharganj, New Delhi – 110055
Website: www.patraslawchambers.com
Email: admin@patraslawchambers.com
Phone: +91 8902224444 / +91 9044049044

Let me know if you’d like this styled into a PDF or infographic image for posting/sharing.