<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mandatory Notic - Patras Law Chamber</title>
	<atom:link href="https://patraslawchambers.com/tag/mandatory-notic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://patraslawchambers.com</link>
	<description>Patras Law Chamber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Complete guide to police notice under Section 35 BNSS / Section 41A CrPC</title>
		<link>https://patraslawchambers.com/complete-guide-to-police-notice-under-section-35-bnss-section-41a-crpc/</link>
					<comments>https://patraslawchambers.com/complete-guide-to-police-notice-under-section-35-bnss-section-41a-crpc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adv. Sudip Patra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[498A IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnesh Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arrest Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Criminal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Notic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patras law chambers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Power to Arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 41A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://patraslawchambers.com/?p=2286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Complete guide to police notice: Correlating Section 41A CrPC with Section [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://patraslawchambers.com/complete-guide-to-police-notice-under-section-35-bnss-section-41a-crpc/">Complete guide to police notice under Section 35 BNSS / Section 41A CrPC</a> first appeared on <a href="https://patraslawchambers.com">Patras Law Chamber</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: center;"><b>A Complete guide to police notice: Correlating Section 41A CrPC with Section 35 BNSS</b></h1>
<ul>
<li>
<h3 dir="ltr">Creditor and contributor of this article:</h3>
<h2 dir="ltr">Patra’s Law Chambers:</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">About Us:</h3>
<p dir="ltr">Patra’s Law Chambers is a law firm with offices in Kolkata &amp;  Delhi, offering comprehensive legal services across various domains. Established in 2020 by Advocate Sudip Patra (Advocate, Supreme Court of India &amp; Calcutta High Court) an alumnus of the Prestigious Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur ,with Post Graduate diploma in Business Law from IIM Calcutta, the firm specializes in Civil, Criminal, Writs,High Court Matters, Trademark, Copyright, Company, Tax, Banking, Property disputes, Service law, Family law, and Supreme Court matters.You can know more about us in <strong><a href="https://patraslawchambers.com/about-us/">here</a></strong></p>
<h3 dir="ltr">Kolkata Office:</h3>
<p dir="ltr">NICCO HOUSE, 6th Floor, 2, Hare Street, Kolkata-700001 (Near Calcutta High Court)</p>
<h3 dir="ltr">Delhi Office:</h3>
<p dir="ltr">House no: 4455/5, First Floor, Ward No. XV, Gali Shahid</p>
<p dir="ltr">Bhagat Singh, Main Bazar Road, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055</p>
<p dir="ltr">Website: <a href="http://www.patraslawchambers.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.patraslawchambers.com</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">Email: <a href="mailto:admin@patraslawchambers.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">admin@patraslawchambers.com</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">Phone: +91 890 222 4444/ +91 7003 715 325</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2><b>1. Introduction: The Evolution from CrPC to BNSS</b></h2>
<p><iframe title="আইনে গ্রেফতারের আগে নোটিশ: ৩৫ ধারা বিএনএসএস (BNSS) | ৭ বছর বা তার কম সাজার ক্ষেত্রে আপনার অধিকার" width="1000" height="563" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5OkmifcUlII?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2287" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM.png" alt="BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 35, Section 41A, Arrest Law, Arnesh Kumar, Police Power to Arrest, Criminal Procedure Law, Patra's Law Chambers, Legal News India, Mandatory Notic" width="1008" height="574" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM.png 1008w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM-300x171.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM-768x437.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM-650x370.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120846-AM-600x342.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1008px) 100vw, 1008px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Indian criminal justice system is undergoing a foundational shift with the introduction of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which is set to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973. A critical area of this legislative evolution concerns the police&#8217;s power to arrest and the procedural safeguards protecting individual liberty.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A cornerstone of these safeguards under the CrPC is </span><b>Section 41A</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which mandates a &#8220;Notice of appearance&#8221; in lieu of arrest for specific offenses. The user&#8217;s query regarding </span><b>Section 35</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> and its correlation with </span><b>Section 41A</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> strikes at the heart of this change.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">To clarify:</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Section 41 of CrPC</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> outlines </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">when police may arrest without a warrant</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Section 41A of CrPC</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> acts as a </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">limitation</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> on that power, mandating a notice for offenses punishable with 7 years or less.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Section 35 of BNSS, 2023,</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is the new provision corresponding to </span><b>Section 41 of CrPC</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The principle of </span><b>Section 41A (CrPC)</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> has been </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">directly incorporated</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> into </span><b>Section 35(3) of the BNSS</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This analysis provides a deep dive into the correlation between these provisions, the jurisprudence that shaped them, their practical applicability, and the landmark judgments that govern this field.</span></p>
<h2><b>2. The Legislative Framework: CrPC vs. BNSS</b></h2>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2288" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM.png" alt="BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 35, Section 41A, Arrest Law, Arnesh Kumar, Police Power to Arrest, Criminal Procedure Law, Patra's Law Chambers, Legal News India, Mandatory Notic" width="1003" height="434" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM.png 1003w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM-300x130.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM-768x332.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM-650x281.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120855-AM-600x260.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1003px) 100vw, 1003px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The primary change is not one of spirit but of structure. The BNSS streamlines the provisions, making the limitation on arrest (the 41A notice) an integral part of the section on arrest powers, rather than a separate section.</span></p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Provision</b></td>
<td><b>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)</b></td>
<td><b>Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Power to Arrest</b></td>
<td><b>Section 41:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> &#8220;When police may arrest without warrant.&#8221; Lists conditions (e.g., cognizable offense in presence, credible information, reasonable suspicion).</span></td>
<td><b>Section 35:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> &#8220;When police may arrest without warrant.&#8221; Largely retains the same conditions as Sec 41, CrPC.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Notice in lieu of Arrest</b></td>
<td><b>Section 41A:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> &#8220;Notice of appearance before police officer.&#8221; This is a </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">separate</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> section detailing the procedure for offenses punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be </span><b>less than 7 years or up to 7 years</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></td>
<td><b>Section 35(3):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> This provision is </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">embedded within</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> the main arrest section. It directly corresponds to the old Sec 41A, CrPC.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Key Correlation &amp; Change:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The BNSS takes the mandate of Section 41A (CrPC) and makes it a subsection</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">$$Sec 35(3)$$</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">of the primary power to arrest (Sec 35). This structural change emphasizes that the </span><b>notice is the default rule</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and arrest is the exception that must be justified. The &#8220;Section 35 Notice&#8221; under BNSS is the new &#8220;41A Notice.&#8221;</span></p>
<h2><b>3. The Law and Jurisprudence: Why the Notice Exists</b></h2>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2289" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM.png" alt="BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 35, Section 41A, Arrest Law, Arnesh Kumar, Police Power to Arrest, Criminal Procedure Law, Patra's Law Chambers, Legal News India, Mandatory Notic" width="1009" height="422" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM.png 1009w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM-300x125.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM-768x321.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM-650x272.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120905-AM-600x251.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1009px) 100vw, 1009px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The provision for a notice of appearance was introduced via the CrPC (Amendment) Act, 2008 (effective 2010). The legislative intent, bolstered by judicial pronouncements, was to address several key issues:</span></p>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Overcrowded Jails:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> A significant portion of the jail population comprised undertrial prisoners, many arrested for minor offenses where pre-trial arrest was unnecessary.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Protection of Liberty:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> To uphold the fundamental right to liberty under </span><b>Article 21</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> of the Constitution, ensuring that arrest—a draconian measure—is not used mechanically.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Preventing Harassment:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> To stop the police from using the power of arrest as a tool for harassment or extortion, especially in cases like matrimonial disputes (498A), minor scuffles, or cheating.</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The jurisprudence was famously cemented by the Supreme Court in </span><b><i>Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2014)**. This judgment transformed Section 41A from a procedural guideline into a mandatory directive.</span></p>
<h3><b>The Mandate of </b><b><i>Arnesh Kumar</i></b><b> (Governing both 41A CrPC &amp; 35 BNSS):</b></h3>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Supreme Court, observing rampant misuse of arrest powers, laid down binding directions:</span></p>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Mandatory Notice:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> For any offense punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less (with or without a fine), the police </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">must</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> issue a notice of appearance (under Sec 41A CrPC / Sec 35(3) BNSS) to the accused.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>No Automatic Arrest:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The accused </span><b>shall not be arrested</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> if they comply with the notice and continue to appear as required.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Justification for Arrest:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> A police officer can only arrest if they have &#8220;reason to believe&#8221; that such arrest is necessary for specific, recorded reasons (the &#8220;Section 41(1)(b)(ii) checklist&#8221; in CrPC, now in Sec 35(1) BNSS):</span></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">To prevent the accused from committing any further offense.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">For proper investigation of the offense.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">To prevent the accused from tampering with evidence.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">To prevent the accused from threatening or inducing any witness.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">To ensure the accused&#8217;s presence in court when required.</span></li>
</ul>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Written Reasons:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The officer </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">must</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> record these reasons in writing. If they decide </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">not</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to arrest, that reason must also be recorded.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Judicial Scrutiny:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The Magistrate, when authorizing detention, must scrutinize the police report and be satisfied that the arrest is justified based on these recorded reasons.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Consequences of Non-Compliance (by Police):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Failure to comply with these directions would make the police officer liable for departmental action and contempt of court.</span></li>
</ol>
<h2><b>4. Applicability: 20 Common Scenarios for a Notice (Section 35 BNSS / 41A CrPC)</b></h2>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2290" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM.png" alt="BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 35, Section 41A, Arrest Law, Arnesh Kumar, Police Power to Arrest, Criminal Procedure Law, Patra's Law Chambers, Legal News India, Mandatory Notic" width="1005" height="644" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM.png 1005w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM-300x192.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM-768x492.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM-650x417.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120917-AM-600x384.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1005px) 100vw, 1005px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A notice under Section 35(3) BNSS (formerly 41A CrPC) is the standard procedure in all cases where the maximum punishment is imprisonment for 7 years or less. This applies to a vast number of FIRs.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here are 20 common offenses</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">$$with corresponding old IPC and new BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) sections$$</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">where such a notice is mandatory:</span></p>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Cruelty by Husband/Relatives (Sec 498A IPC / Sec 84 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arnesh Kumar</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> case itself arose from this, making it the classic example. (Punishment: 3 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Theft (Sec 379 IPC / Sec 301 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Simple theft. (Punishment: 3 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Cheating (Sec 420 IPC / Sec 316 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Many white-collar and financial disputes. (Punishment: 7 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span><b>):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 3 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Rash and Negligent Driving (Sec 279 IPC / Sec 106(1) BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Common in accident cases. (Punishment: 6 months).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Causing Death by Negligence (Sec 304A IPC / Sec 106(2) BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 2 years, though note BNS has a separate provision for &#8220;hit and run&#8221;).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Simple Hurt (Sec 323 IPC / Sec 113 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 1 year).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Grievous Hurt (Sec 325 IPC / Sec 114 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 7 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Wrongful Restraint (Sec 341 IPC / Sec 136 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 1 month).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Assault on a Woman to Outrage Modesty (Sec 354 IPC / Sec 73 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 1-5 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Stalking (Sec 354D IPC / Sec 77 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 3-5 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Defamation (Sec 499/500 IPC / Sec 354 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 2 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Criminal Intimidation (Sec 506 IPC / Sec 350 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 2 years, or 7 if threat is severe).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Insult to Modesty of a Woman (Sec 509 IPC / Sec 78 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 3 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Mischief (Sec 427 IPC / Sec 322 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Causing damage to property. (Punishment: 2 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>House Trespass (Sec 448 IPC / Sec 328 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 1 year).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Rioting (Sec 147 IPC / Sec 187 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 2 years).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Affray (Sec 160 IPC / Sec 190 BNS):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 1 month).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Negligent Conduct with Fire (Sec 285 IPC):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 6 months).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><b>Adulteration of Food/Drink (Sec 272 IPC):</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Punishment: 6 months).</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In all these scenarios, filing an FIR does </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">not</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> automatically give police the power to arrest. They </span><b>must</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> first issue a Section 35(3) BNSS notice.</span></p>
<h2><b>5. Landmark Judgments on Section 41A CrPC (Applicable to Sec 35 BNSS)</b></h2>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2291" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM.png" alt="BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 35, Section 41A, Arrest Law, Arnesh Kumar, Police Power to Arrest, Criminal Procedure Law, Patra's Law Chambers, Legal News India, Mandatory Notic" width="1013" height="735" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM.png 1013w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM-300x218.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM-768x557.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM-650x472.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120927-AM-600x435.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1013px) 100vw, 1013px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The following table outlines the key judgments that have shaped the law on arrest and the necessity of a 41A notice.</span></p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Case Citation</b></td>
<td><b>Court</b></td>
<td><b>Key Principle / Ratio Decidendi</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2014) 8 SCC 273**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><b>The lodestar case.</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Made issuance of Sec 41A notice mandatory for offenses with punishment &lt;= 7 years. Linked police and magistrate accountability to this process.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2022) 10 SCC 51**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Re-affirmed and strengthened </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arnesh Kumar</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Directed creation of &#8220;Bail Acts.&#8221; Held that non-compliance with 41A is a valid ground for granting anticipatory or regular bail.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Siddharth v. State of U.P.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2022) 1 SCC 676**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Held that arrest is not required even when a chargesheet is filed. If 41A was complied with during investigation, the accused does not need to be taken into custody at the time of chargesheeting.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Md. Asfak Alam v. State of Jharkhand</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2023) SCC OnLine SC 892**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Recently reiterated the </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arnesh Kumar</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> guidelines, expressing dismay at continued non-compliance by police and lower judiciary. Emphasized that 41A is not a mere formality.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (1994) 4 SCC 260**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">A precursor to 41A. Held that arrest is not a must in every cognizable case. An arrest should not be made in a routine manner; it must be justified.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (1997) 1 SCC 416**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Laid down 11 mandatory guidelines for police to follow during arrest and detention to protect the fundamental rights of the arrestee. (This is related to the </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">procedure</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> of arrest).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Rini Johar v. State of M.P.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2016) 11 SCC 703**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Awarded compensation to individuals who were illegally arrested in violation of Section 41A, holding the state vicariously liable.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Amandeep Singh Johar v. State of NCT of Delhi</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2018) SCC OnLine Del 6679**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Delhi High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Issued detailed &#8220;checklists&#8221; and &#8220;standing orders&#8221; for Delhi Police to ensure strict compliance with Section 41A procedures.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar v. Union of India</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2018) 10 SCC 443**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">While dealing with 498A, it reinforced the </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arnesh Kumar</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> guidelines and struck down automatic arrests.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>M.C. Abraham v. State of Maharashtra</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2003) 2 SCC 649**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Held that police are not bound to arrest a person simply because they are an accused in a cognizable offense, even if they have the power to do so.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2014) 2 SCC 1**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">While about mandatory FIR registration, it&#8217;s relevant as the 41A procedure kicks in </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">after</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> the FIR is registered and the investigation begins.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (1980) 2 SCC 565**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">The constitutional bench judgment on anticipatory bail (438 CrPC). Non-issuance of a 41A notice is a strong ground for seeking anticipatory bail.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>V.S. Krishnan v. State of T.N.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2021) SCC OnLine Mad 2120**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Madras High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clearly stated that any remand by a Magistrate without ensuring 41A compliance is illegal and violates Article 21.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Rajesh Sharma v. State of U.P.</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2018) 10 SCC 472**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Though later modified) This judgment (related to 498A) also discussed measures to prevent precipitative arrests, reinforcing the 41A framework.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Bhupinder Singh v. Union of India</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2011) 124 DRJ 545**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Delhi High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed the legislative intent behind the 2008/2010 amendments (introducing 41A), stating it was to protect citizens from humiliation and harassment.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Pala Ram v. State of Haryana</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2019) SCC OnLine P&amp;H 764**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">P&amp;H High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Granted anticipatory bail noting that the police had failed to follow the 41A procedure before attempting to arrest the accused.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Arvind Kumar v. State</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2021) SCC OnLine Del 3442**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Delhi High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed the validity of serving a 41A notice through electronic means like WhatsApp, recognizing modern communication methods.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2018) 11 SCC 1**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Supreme Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">A landmark judgment on bail (though under PMLA), it strongly affirmed that &#8216;liberty is the norm and jail is the exception.&#8217; This principle is the foundation of Sec 41A.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Mehale &amp; Ors v. State of Karnataka</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2020) SCC OnLine Kar 3058**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Karnataka High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Quashed criminal proceedings that were initiated </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">after</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> an illegal arrest was made in gross violation of 41A, showing severe consequences for non-compliance.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Srikanth v. State of Telangana</i></b><span style="font-weight: 400;">** (2019) SCC OnLine TS 1238**</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Telangana High Court</span></td>
<td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Issued specific directions to all police stations and Magistrates in the state to strictly implement the </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arnesh Kumar</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> guidelines.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><b>6. Conclusion</b></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The transition from Section 41A of the CrPC to Section 35(3) of the BNSS is a positive legislative reinforcement of judicial wisdom. By embedding the &#8220;notice of appearance&#8221; directly into the section governing the power to arrest, the law now more clearly and forcefully communicates that </span><b>arrest is the last resort, not the first step.</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For any person named in an FIR for an offense punishable with 7 years or less, the &#8220;Section 35 Notice&#8221; is a legal right. Compliance with this notice is the surest way to avoid pre-trial detention, and non-compliance by the police is a serious procedural lapse that can be grounds for bail, departmental action, and even contempt of court. This provision is a critical safeguard for the liberty of the common citizen against the arbitrary exercise of state power.</span></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Disclaimer: This write-up is for informational and academic purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal issues, please consult with a qualified legal professional.</span></i></p>
<p><b>A Research Publication by:</b></p>
<p><b>Patra’s Law Chambers</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kolkata Office:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">NICCO HOUSE, 6th Floor, 2, Hare Street, Kolkata-700001 (Near Calcutta High Court)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Delhi Office:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">House no: 4455/5, First FSection 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitaloor, Ward No. XV, Gali Shahid Bhagat Singh, Main Bazar Road, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Website: www.patraslawchambers.com</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Email: admin@patraslawchambers.com</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita_watermarkPhone: +91 890 222 4444 / +91 9044 04 9044</span></p>
<p><a href="https://patraslawchambers.com/best-criminal-lawyer-kolkata/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2292" src="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM.png" alt="" width="991" height="281" srcset="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM.png 991w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM-300x85.png 300w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM-768x218.png 768w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM-650x184.png 650w, https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-14-at-120934-AM-600x170.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 991px) 100vw, 991px" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://patraslawchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Section-35-of-the-Bharatiya-Nagarik-Suraksha-Sanhita_watermark.pdf">RESOURCES: DOWNLOAD THIS ARTICLE AS PDF</a></strong></p><p>The post <a href="https://patraslawchambers.com/complete-guide-to-police-notice-under-section-35-bnss-section-41a-crpc/">Complete guide to police notice under Section 35 BNSS / Section 41A CrPC</a> first appeared on <a href="https://patraslawchambers.com">Patras Law Chamber</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://patraslawchambers.com/complete-guide-to-police-notice-under-section-35-bnss-section-41a-crpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
